Jump to Navigation
Jump to Content

Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources Council

Citation: 19 ELR 20749
No. No. 87-1704, 490 U.S. 360/29 ERC 1508/(U.S., 05/01/1989) Rev'd

The Court rules that an agency's decision on whether to prepare a supplemental environment impact statement (EIS) should be reviewed under the arbitrary and capricious standard, and upholds the Army Corps of Engineers' decision not to supplement an EIS for a dam in Oregon....

You must be an ELR subscriber to view the full case summary.

You are not logged in. To access this content: