Jump to Navigation
Jump to Content

Save Our Sycamore v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Auth.

Citation: 8 ELR 20611
No. Nos. 76-1978, -2712, 576 F.2d 573/(5th Cir., 07/12/1978) Aff'd

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals determines that a programmatic environmental impact statement (EIS) prepared in connection with a proposed urban rapid transit rail system satisfies the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) without the preparation of additional site-specific EISs for each of the substations of the system...

You must be an ELR subscriber to view the full case summary.

You are not logged in. To access this content: