Jump to Navigation
Jump to Content

Aeschliman v. NRC

Citation: 6 ELR 20599
No. Nos. 73-1776, -1867, 547 F.2d 622/9 ERC 1289/(D.C. Cir., 07/21/1976)

The court reverses and remands a decision of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission granting construction permits for a proposed nuclear power plant in Midland, Michigan, because the NEPA environmental impact statement (EIS) for the project failed to consider explicitly the alternative of energy conservation....

You must be an ELR subscriber to view the full case summary.

You are not logged in. To access this content: