Jump to Navigation
Jump to Content

Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal.

ELR Citation: ELR 20427
Nos. No. S001-1922, 764 P.2d 278/253 Cal. Rptr. 426, (Cal., 12/01/1988)

The California Supreme Court rules that an environmental impact report (EIR) under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) must discuss foreseeable future impacts of a chosen alternative, CEQA requires both mitigation measures and project alternatives to be discussed in an EIR, and the agency must explain why other alternatives were not ...

You must be an ELR subscriber to view the full case summary.

You are not logged in. To access this content: