Jump to Navigation
Jump to Content

Pizitz, Inc. v. Volpe

Citation: 2 ELR 20379
No. No. 72-1995, 467 F.2d 208/4 ERC 1401/(5th Cir., 07/11/1972) Aff'd per curiam

On appeal from the Middle District of Alabama, held, that NEPA is not applicable to highway construction changes that had been contemplated in a design that complied with all required standards when originally approved....

You must be an ELR subscriber to view the full case summary.

You are not logged in. To access this content: