Jump to Navigation
Jump to Content

Mraz v. Canadian Universal Ins. Co.

Citation: 17 ELR 20372
No. No. 85-2399, 804 F.2d 1325/25 ERC 1193/(4th Cir., 11/04/1986) Rev'd

The court holds that an insurance company does not have a duty to defend the insureds, who are defendants in a cost recovery action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), because there was no occurrence during the insurance policy period, there was no property damage within the meaning of the in...

You must be an ELR subscriber to view the full case summary.

You are not logged in. To access this content: