Jump to Navigation
Jump to Content

Sierra Club v. Marsh

Citation: 23 ELR 20321
No. No. 92-1312, 976 F.2d 763/35 ERC 2002/(1st Cir., 09/30/1992) Ruling on secondary impact claims

The court holds that state and federal agencies involved in a proposed port project in Searsport, Maine, reasonably decided to restrict the analysis in an environmental impact statement (EIS) of secondary impacts from the project to four light-dry industries....

You must be an ELR subscriber to view the full case summary.

You are not logged in. To access this content: