United States v. Ameren Missouri, No. 19-231 (S.D. Ill. Feb. 21, 2019). Settling CERCLA defendants must pay all future response costs related to Site P of the Sauget Area 2 Superfund site in Sauget, Illinois, and complete the remedial work selected in a record of decision for the site that is estimated to cost $2.9 million.

United States v. Ameren Missouri, No. 19-231 (S.D. Ill. Feb. 21, 2019). Settling CERCLA defendants must pay all future response costs related to Site P of the Sauget Area 2 Superfund site in Sauget, Illinois, and complete the remedial work selected in a record of decision for the site that is estimated to cost $2.9 million.

United States v. Ameren Missouri, No. 19-231 (S.D. Ill. Feb. 21, 2019). Settling CERCLA defendants must pay all future response costs related to Site P of the Sauget Area 2 Superfund site in Sauget, Illinois, and complete the remedial work selected in a record of decision for the site that is estimated to cost $2.9 million.

United States v. Ameren Missouri, No. 19-231 (S.D. Ill. Feb. 21, 2019). Settling CERCLA defendants must pay all future response costs related to Site P of the Sauget Area 2 Superfund site in Sauget, Illinois, and complete the remedial work selected in a record of decision for the site that is estimated to cost $2.9 million.

United States v. Ameren Missouri, No. 19-231 (S.D. Ill. Feb. 21, 2019). Settling CERCLA defendants must pay all future response costs related to Site P of the Sauget Area 2 Superfund site in Sauget, Illinois, and complete the remedial work selected in a record of decision for the site that is estimated to cost $2.9 million.

United States v. Ameren Missouri, No. 19-231 (S.D. Ill. Feb. 21, 2019). Settling CERCLA defendants must pay all future response costs related to Site P of the Sauget Area 2 Superfund site in Sauget, Illinois, and complete the remedial work selected in a record of decision for the site that is estimated to cost $2.9 million.

United States v. Holyoke, Massachusetts, City of, No. 19-cv-10332 (D. Mass. Feb. 21, 2019). A settling CWA defendant that discharged pollutants from its wastewater collection system without authorization and not in compliance with its NPDES permit must submit a long-term, combined sewer overflow plan by December 31, 2019.

United States v. Holyoke, Massachusetts, City of, No. 19-cv-10332 (D. Mass. Feb. 21, 2019). A settling CWA defendant that discharged pollutants from its wastewater collection system without authorization and not in compliance with its NPDES permit must submit a long-term, combined sewer overflow plan by December 31, 2019.

United States v. Holyoke, Massachusetts, City of, No. 19-cv-10332 (D. Mass. Feb. 21, 2019). A settling CWA defendant that discharged pollutants from its wastewater collection system without authorization and not in compliance with its NPDES permit must submit a long-term, combined sewer overflow plan by December 31, 2019.

United States v. Holyoke, Massachusetts, City of, No. 19-cv-10332 (D. Mass. Feb. 21, 2019). A settling CWA defendant that discharged pollutants from its wastewater collection system without authorization and not in compliance with its NPDES permit must submit a long-term, combined sewer overflow plan by December 31, 2019.