Lake Hefner Open Space Alliance v. Dole
Citation: 19 ELR 21282
No. No. 87-1381, 871 F.2d 943/(10th Cir., 03/28/1989)
The court holds that the Federal Highway Administration's (FHA's) approval of a final environment impact statement (EIS) for an Oklahoma highway project did not violate the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) or the parkland protection provision of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1968. The court first holds that the FHA properly complied with the Federal-Aid Highway Act, 23 U.S.C. § 138, which requires that parkland not be used for highway projects unless no other prudent or feasible alternatives exist. The alternative routes to the selected plan all presented unique problems that justified the FHA's decision to allow the use of land from Lake Hefner Park. The court next holds that the failure of the draft EIS to include two of the eight alternatives ultimately contained in the final EIS was not fatal. One purpose for soliciting public comments on the draft EIS is to allow the agency to develop new alternatives that may have been overlooked. The court finally holds that the FHA's rejection of the "no build" alternative because existing streets could not accommodate future traffic volumes was not arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion.
Counsel for Plaintiff-Appellant
William W. Gorden Jr.
4000 Classen Ctr., Oklahoma City OK 73118
Counsel for Defendants-Appellees
Jean C. Rogers, Regional Counsel
Federal Highway Administration
819 Taylor St., Rm. 8A00, Fort Worth TX 76102
William S. Price, U.S. Attorney; William Lee Borden Jr., Ass't U.S. Attorney
4434 U.S. Courthouse, 200 NW Fourth St., Oklahoma City OK 73102
Before BALDOCK, EBEL and McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.