United States v. San Juan, The Municipality of, No. 3:14-cv-1476-CCC (D.P.R. Dec. 23, 2015). Under one proposed consent decree, a settling CWA defendant responsible for violations at three of its stormwater pump stations in San Juan, Puerto Rico, must apply for a permit and implement a stormwater management program, undertake certain capital and operational improvements to its pump stations, and provide financial support for investigations and work performed in the pump station service areas; under a second proposed consent decree, two separate settling CWA defendants responsible for violations throughout their storm sewer systems in San Juan must perform injunctive relief and implement other infrastructure and operational improvements to their municipal separate stormwater sewer system.

United States v. San Juan, The Municipality of, No. 3:14-cv-1476-CCC (D.P.R. Dec. 23, 2015). Under one proposed consent decree, a settling CWA defendant responsible for violations at three of its stormwater pump stations in San Juan, Puerto Rico, must apply for a permit and implement a stormwater management program, undertake certain capital and operational improvements to its pump stations, and provide financial support for investigations and work performed in the pump station service areas; under a second proposed consent decree, two separate settling CWA defendants responsible for violations throughout their storm sewer systems in San Juan must perform injunctive relief and implement other infrastructure and operational improvements to their municipal separate stormwater sewer system.

United States v. San Juan, The Municipality of, No. 3:14-cv-1476-CCC (D.P.R. Dec. 23, 2015). Under one proposed consent decree, a settling CWA defendant responsible for violations at three of its stormwater pump stations in San Juan, Puerto Rico, must apply for a permit and implement a stormwater management program, undertake certain capital and operational improvements to its pump stations, and provide financial support for investigations and work performed in the pump station service areas; under a second proposed consent decree, two separate settling CWA defendants responsible for violations throughout their storm sewer systems in San Juan must perform injunctive relief and implement other infrastructure and operational improvements to their municipal separate stormwater sewer system.

USDA expanded the organic assessment exemption set forth in commodity promotion programs to cover all “organic” and “100 percent organic” products certified under the National Organic Program regardless of whether the person requesting the exemption also produces, handles, markets, processes, manufactures, feeds, or imports conventional or nonorganic products.

USDA expanded the organic assessment exemption set forth in commodity promotion programs to cover all “organic” and “100 percent organic” products certified under the National Organic Program regardless of whether the person requesting the exemption also produces, handles, markets, processes, manufactures, feeds, or imports conventional or nonorganic products.

USDA expanded the organic assessment exemption set forth in commodity promotion programs to cover all “organic” and “100 percent organic” products certified under the National Organic Program regardless of whether the person requesting the exemption also produces, handles, markets, processes, manufactures, feeds, or imports conventional or nonorganic products.

United States v. Northcutt, Inc., No. 6:15-cv-1396 (D. Kan. Dec. 18, 2015). Settling CAA defendant that violated regulations governing sales of substitutes for ozone-depleting substances at its facility in Wichita, Kansas, must pay a $100,000 civil penalty, is required to discontinue domestic marketing and sales of the substitutes at issue, and must send a warning letter to past domestic purchasers of the substitutes.

United States v. Northcutt, Inc., No. 6:15-cv-1396 (D. Kan. Dec. 18, 2015). Settling CAA defendant that violated regulations governing sales of substitutes for ozone-depleting substances at its facility in Wichita, Kansas, must pay a $100,000 civil penalty, is required to discontinue domestic marketing and sales of the substitutes at issue, and must send a warning letter to past domestic purchasers of the substitutes.

United States v. Northcutt, Inc., No. 6:15-cv-1396 (D. Kan. Dec. 18, 2015). Settling CAA defendant that violated regulations governing sales of substitutes for ozone-depleting substances at its facility in Wichita, Kansas, must pay a $100,000 civil penalty, is required to discontinue domestic marketing and sales of the substitutes at issue, and must send a warning letter to past domestic purchasers of the substitutes.

SIP Approval: Texas (attainment of the 1997 ozone NAAQS for the the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria nonattainment area during the 2012-2014 monitoring period).